My collection of wise, and not so wise, postings

Thursday 2 May 2013

HE WORKS, SHE WORKS - BUT WHAT DIFFERENT IMPRESSIONS THEY MAKE

Some time ago, when I was sorting old paperwork which had been piling up for quite some time (I suspect we are talking years and years here), I found this list of different impressions men and women give when doing their job. It was a list to demonstrate to us (I was a student at the time we got it) how everything can be said, but the impression is tinted by what words you choose to use.

Having a few years of work experience, I find it more amusing now than I did then, maybe you recognize one or two... or more? So... here it goes:
Have you ever found yourself up against the old double-standard at work? Then you know how annoying it can be and how lonely you can feel. Supervisors and co-workers still judge us by old stereotypes that say women are emotional, disorganized and inefficient. Here are some of the most glaring examples of the typical office double-standard.
The family picture is on HIS desk: Ah, a solid responsible family man.
The family picture is on HER desk: Hm, her family will come before her career.

HIS desk is cluttered: He’s obviously a hard worker and busy man.
HER desk is cluttered: She’s obviously a disorganized scatterbrain.

HE’s talking with co-workers: He must be discussing the latest deal.
SHE’s talking with co-workers: She must be gossiping.

HE’s not at his desk: He must be at a meeting.
SHE’s not at her desk: She must be in the ladies’ room.

HE’s having lunch with the boss: He’s on his way up.
SHE’s having lunch with the boss: They must be having an affair.

HE’s getting married: He’ll get more settled
SHE’s getting married: She’ll get pregnant and leave.

HE’s having a baby: He’ll need a raise.
SHE’s having a baby: She’ll cost the company money in maternity benefits.

HE’s leaving for a better job: He recognizes a good opportunity.
SHE’s leaving for a better job: Women are undependable.

HE’s Aggressive.
SHE’s pushy.

HE’s careful.
SHE’s picky.

HE loses his temper.
SHE’s bitchy.

HE’s depressed.
SHE’s moody.

HE follows through.
SHE doesn’t know when to quit.

HE’s firm
SHE’s stubborn.

HE makes wise judgements.
SHE reveals her prejudices.

HE is a man of the world.
SHE’s been around.

HE isn’t afraid to say what he thinks.
SHE’s opinionated.

HE exercises authority.
SHE’s tyrannical.

HE’s discreet.
SHE’s secretive.

HE’s a stern taskmaster.
SHE’s difficult to work for.

Immigrants....?

For the last 8 months or so, the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, has been celebrated as a courageous woman; stating her mind in plain words. The reason is how she addressed a limited group of people who reside in Australia.
Her speech is now embraced by many groups of people and individuals all over the world, who instantly take a liking to what was expressed. It is not put dead, as many speeches  and statements are, her words live and thrive by the help of social medias.
Only problem is: This is a statement which is awfully applicable for those who look for reasonable arguments to attack not only those she tried to address, but vulnerable groups which really need the protection a free democracy can provide. Groups which have left their network of family, friends, traditions, culture… everything known and part of their background, to be safe. And they use the words of a respected Prime Minister to do so; Adding credibility and affirmative effect to extreme views. On either side. On every side, in fact.
It is hard not to agree to what is stated, but I find it in many ways speculative. Paragraphs are taken out of context and published as the truth. And it fits their agenda perfectly, as they leave out the background to what was said. And the cause they justify by these extracts are far from friendly minded.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard - Australia
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.
Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote:

'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT... Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.'
'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.'
'We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!'
'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.'
'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.


''This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.'

'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'

These days I give lectures about Australia. The curriculum says I am to present social conditions in a selection of English speaking countries.
Knowing what has happened in Australia for two centuries (i.e. to those who had lived in the country for at least 40 000 years), I can’t help but thinking that the bravest thing about her speech was not to be as blunt as she was. The bravest thing was to state what she did, fully knowing Australia and Britain only 7 years ago apologized to the lost and the stolen generations. And they have not reached their goal yet, by far, if their goal is to set things right.
Looking at history, I don’t think any country, with a clear conscience, can talk about immigrants as “them”, because people have moved across borders, clearing way for themselves, bringing their own background with them, for… well, forever, I guess.
Makes me wonder: When do you stop being an immigrant and can fully claim freedom of speech, religion and political view? When the citizenship comes through? Two generations after? Ever?